Geekbench 4 Results

1. Geekbench 4.1
2. Geekbench 4 Results 3
3. Geekbench 4 Results 2018
4. Geekbench 4 Cpu Results
5. Geekbench 4 Results Mobile

When it comes to overall CPU performance Geekbench 4 and Geekbench 5 give very similar results. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X has 27% higher scores than the Intel Core i9-9900K in Geekbench 4. Geekbench: This is a benchmark of Geekbench 5 Pro. Geekbench 5 Test: GPU OpenCL. OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 1,212 public results since 14 August 2020 with the latest data as of 20 December 2020.

12 CPUs Tested on Geekbench 5 and Geekbench 4

Speed of latest phones based on geekbench 5 benchmarks. Find out which android or iphone phone is the best. Which type of phone from what brand is world fastest in geekbench 5. Which model in this comparison is most powerful and good enough to be in top 10 geekbench 5 phones. Find out which is better out of all geekbench 5 results. In the year 2021. Bottom Multi-Core Geekbench 4 CPU Results. Uploaded Model Platform User Single-Core Score Multi-Core Score; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 04:28:15 +0000: MacBook Air (13-inch Mid 2013) Intel Core i7-4650U 1700 MHz (2 cores) Mac OS X 64-bit 3458 6389 Thu, 22 Aug 2019 05:33:28 +0000.

Geekbench 5 was officially released by Primate Labs today and Legit Reviews has been taking a look at this benchmark in the lab. The release of Geekbench 5 brings new machine learning, augmented reality, and computational photography workloads to the CPU test. Primate Labs also updated their existing workloads to use larger data sets to better measure the effect memory performance has on CPU performance. Geekbench 5's GPU Compute Benchmark now includes support for Vulkan and got new Compute workloads that measure he performance of computer vision and computational photography algorithms.

We've been using Geekbench 4 for some time here on the site for CPU benchmarks, so we wanted to take a quick look at our the new results from Geekbench 5 and let you see them against our ‘old' Geekbench 4 results.

For testing we will be comparing an Intel Z390 desktop platform to an AMD X570 desktop platform with six processors from each company at several different price points. Windows 10 Pro 64-bit v1903 with all updates as of 9/02/2019 was the operating system used and all the drivers were updated. Both systems used Corsair Hydro Series H115i PRO liquid CPU coolers and the same 1TB NVMe SSD.

The ASUS ROG Maximus XI Extreme motherboard (pricing) was run with BIOS/UEFI version 1105 and the memory was set to operate at 3400 MHz with CL16 timings. ASUS Multi-Core Enhancement (MCE) was disabled.

Geekbench 4.1

The Gigabyte X570 AORUS Master motherboard (pricing) for AMD Ryzen processors was running BIOS/UEFI version F5l (AGESA 1.0.0.3 ABB) and also had the memory set to operate at 3400 MHz with CL16 timings.

Geekbench 4 Results 3

Here are the benchmark results of the CPU workload in Geekbench 4:

Here are the benchmark results of the CPU workload in Geekbench 5:

When it comes to overall CPU performance Geekbench 4 and Geekbench 5 give very similar results. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X has 27% higher scores than the Intel Core i9-9900K in Geekbench 4. In Geekbench 5 the gap widens to about 32%.

Geekbench 4 Results 2018

Taking a closer look at some of the new workloads in Geekbench 5 on a couple chips from each company shows that AMD Ryzen does really good on the new Speech Recognition test in Geekbench 5. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X scores 225% faster than the Intel Core i9-9900K on this workload. The brand new machine learning test has the 3900X scoring about 31% faster than the 9900K.

We'll be including Geekbench 5 results in our CPU tests moving forward and just wanted to give you a quick look of Geekbench 4 versus Geekbench 5 on the same test platforms.

Geekbench 4 Cpu Results

We can add a new entry to the list of Marvel-themed codenames for HMD phones – Doctor Strange. Unofficially, this phone is expected to be marketed under the name Nokia 3.4 and it is part of the upcoming '.4' series, which includes the Nokia 2.4 (aka Wolverine).

Cookie 5 8 4 – protect your online privacy screen. The Nokia 3.4 was spotted in Geekbench results, which list the chipset as 'Qualcomm Qualcomm' (that's not very helpful, is it?). but the score matches the vivo Y20 result – a phone that is expected to be equipped with the new Snapdragon 460 chipset.

Geekbench 5 results: Nokia 3.4 (Doctor Strange) • Nokia 2.4 (Wolverine)

The Y20 motherboard was listed as 'Bengal', a name that has been associated with the S662 instead. Both chips are nearly identical, differing mainly in clock speed (the advantage goes to the 662, naturally).

Either way, with four Cortex-A73 based large cores, the Nokia 3.4 is flexing bigger muscles than its 2.4 sibling, which will use the aging Helio P22 chipset instead (with all A53 cores). The 3-series model has more RAM too, 3 GB on the unit that ran the test.

These two Nokias, plus the mid-range 6.3 and 7.3, are expected to be unveiled at IFA, which starts on September 3. Cornerstone 2 7 13 – feature rich subversion client. Graphic inspector 2 4 42.

Source | Via

Source | Via

Reader comments

Geekbench 4 Results Mobile

• Malbaby
• 7sK

Neither the N97 or N73 were HMD phone?? Nokia was bought by HMD in 2016. N97 came out in 2009..

• Q
• 61r

Nokia (now HMD) has been clueless on smartphone hardware since .. FOREVER! Just look at N73 or N97; both are capable smartphones, but bottle-necked by Nokia's cheapskate decision to give it VERY underpowered CPU & low RAM size. Ev..

• Q
• 61r

LOL.. Both CPU & GPU of SD660 is better than even the SD665 & SD662! Especially GPU; Adreno 512 is capable of supporting games up to QHD, while Adreno 610 in SD460 is very likely to be downclocked version of Adreno 610 in SD665/662 which..